|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
174
   |
Posted - 2012.06.06 21:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
CynoMonkey wrote:Word in the bilges is that I-red have pissed off a few of syndicates more capable alliances who, perhaps ironically, see themselves as anti pirate and are coming together to rid syndicate of the "i-red pirate scum". Perhaps OP has heard this also and is trying to spin things in order to garner sympathy?
Edit: OOC comments removed - ISD Eshtir
You're words place a smile upon my face, it is good to know we are having such a effect on these more capable "anti-pirate" alliances. I am sure the people you represent are quite upset with the loss of the constellation in mere months.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. |
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
174
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 23:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Abandoning Intaki would be abandoning Ishukone's interests.
We still maintain a large quantity, if not the majority of infrastructure in the area. As stated by Oniseki, we still maintain operational star-bases, and custom offices.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. |
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
174
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 13:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
You will find that anything that does not involve violence is beyond Ms. Kim's comprehension. She will always believe that Ishukone, and the other eight will operate just as the Protectorate does.
Quote:The Ishukone Megacorporation is a part of the Caldari State, if you didn't know. And the State is in fact at war with Gallente Federation, if you didn't know. By attacking any Caldari militia members, you are attacking those, who are bringing order and restoring ownership of Ishukone to Intaki. In fact, you are attacking Ishukone interests as well. Enjoy fighting for the Federation.
But because I do love to repeat myself, with the hope that something might click. Ishukone has development rights in the Intaki system if it is under the State's occupancy, or under the Federation's control, as per an agreement with the Intaki government.
By your logic, the Protectorate forces attacking Ishukone assets, effectively murdering citizens of the Caldari State in the Intaki solar system you are.. In fact, oh wait.. attacking the Caldari State.
Baka.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. |
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
178
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 23:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
James Syagrius wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote: Furthermore, I feel it is quite amusing for you to accuse us of abandoning our contracts when you are quite literally only privy to one contract. The one between I-RED and FCO. Seeing as I-REDGÇÖs primary representative has determined to use the existence of our contract as a weapon against FCO and its Chancellor I have no alternative but to terminate it. You may consider this notification of the same.
Oniseki has only stated that your Chancellor only knew about one contract that Ishukone-Raata had in place, making his previous accusations false. Under the terms of this agreement it is well within your right to withdraw, though under the circumstances it is a poor decision.
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. |
|
|
| |
|